The doctrinal nature of the policy of promoting the state`s external image in the conditions of a new world order formation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2022.4.12Keywords:
international political subjectivity; state`s image; information space; new world order; US foreign policy; Ukrainian-American relationsAbstract
Within the framework of the author’s scientific research, three types of communicative models of the world’s states were identified, which reflect the basic principles of building state information policy and reflect the key characteristics of the political system. Among them are subsidiary, vertical, and transitional models. The institutional method was used to prove the specifics of the state as a political institution that is the bearer of national images, as well as the role and degree of influence of public policy on the formation of ideas about the state in the external information space, on the policy of promoting and transforming these images, with an emphasis on the actions of those states that shape the global political discourse of today. The authors propose an integral model of state’s public image formation, which provides for the synergy of actors of public diplomacy. The result of its implementation is the formation of the components of the state image (regional, multicultural, culinary, educational, expert) together with official products (national symbols, reputation characteristics, socio-economic development indicators, rating indicators and e-diplomacy products) «from below». Both the central government and local communities in the context of the implementation of «bottom-up» policy should be involved in the realization of a successful image formation policy. The authors emphasize that the policy of state’s image formation in the external information space should be considered as a multifaceted component of the foreign policy of the state. The tools, channels and subjects of formation and adjustment of the stateʼs image should be embedded in each of the vectors of foreign policy – in security, diplomatic, economic, social, legal, and directly information vectors.
References
Anholt S. Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Basingstroke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. 134 p.
Bondarenko Sergii, Nagornyak Tetyana & Polovyi Mykola. Modern Information Models of the National Interests’ Protection Policy of the World Countrie. European Journal of Transformation Studies, 6(1), 2018. pp. 44-55.
Chossudovsky M. The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order. 2nd ed. Quebek : Global Research, Center for Research and Globalization (CRG), 2003. 376 p.
Coleman, J. S. Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(6), 1986. pp. 1309-1335.
Deutsch, K. W. The nerves of government : models of political communication and control with a new introduction. New York: The Free Press, 1966. 316 p.
Friedman T. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005. 488 p.
Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Т. 1).
Beacon Press : Boston, 1984. 465 p.
Keller, K., Aperia T., Georgson M. Strategic Brand Management: A European Perspective. London : Prentice Hall, 2008. 856 p.
Keohane R. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1984. 312 p.
Korten D. Change the Story, Change the Future: A Living Economy for a Living Earth. Oakland :
Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2015. 200 p.
Kulyk V. National identity in Ukraine: impact of Euromaidan and the war. Europe-Asia Studies, 68, (4), 2016. pp. 588-608.
Lewin, K. Frontiers in group dynamics II: channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), Human Relations, 1947. pp. 143-153.
Maxwell McCombs & Donald Shaw. The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 1972. pp. 176-187.
Nye J. Jr. Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics. New York : PublicAffairs, 2004. 208 p.
Osmolovska A. Tendencies of Ukraine`s Image Formation in Polish Information Space. Evropský politický a právní diskurz. Czech Republic, 6 (6), 2019. pp. 77–82.
Sampson E. The Image Factor: A Guide to Effective Self-presentation for Career Enhancement. London: Kogan Page, 1994. 128 p.
Sassen S. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. 1st ed. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1991. 447 p.
Scott, А. The image of the state and the expansion of the international system.
URL : https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:56853ff2-c5f0-4102-9b5a-e88f42d54edf.
Sengupta A. Symbols and the image of the state in Eurasia. Singapore : Singapore Springer, 2017. 152 p.
Bohush D. 10 sekretiv politychnykh kampaniy : navch. posib. Vyd. 1. Kyyiv : Mizhnarodnyy respublikans’kyy instytut, 2016. 168 s.
Bondarenko S. Informatsiynyy komponent polityky brendynhu terytoriy v umovakh neliniynykh protsesi. Politychne zhyttya. 1-2 (2017), ss. 21-26.
Bondarenko, S. Informatsiynyy napryam polityky zakhystu natsional’nykh interesiv derzhavy (dysertatsiya na zdobuttya naukovoho stupenya kandydat politychnykh nauk). Vinnytsya: Donets’kyy natsional’nyy universytet imeni Vasylya Stusa, 2017. 254 s.
Bondarenko, S. Informatsiynyy napryam politykyzakhystu natsional’nykh interesiv derzhavy.
T. L. Nagornyak, M. V. Prymush, M. A. Pol’ovyy ta in. (Eds.), Suchasni suspil’no-politychni protsesy u sviti ta Ukrayini, Vinnytsia, 2019. Ss. 95-115.
Burd’ye P. Sotsial’noye prostranstvo: polya i praktiki. Per. N.A. Shmatko. Sankt-Peterburg : Aleteyya, 2005. 146 s.
Verbilovich, O. Teoriya kommunikativnogo deystviya: klyuchevyye kategorii i poznavatel’nyy potentsial. Publichnaya sfera: teoriya, metodologiya, keys-stadi, 2013. S. 35-52.
Hrytsak Ya. Kudy rukhayet’sya svit. Kyyiv : Hrani-T, 2015. 192 s.
Vallerstayn I. Mirosistemnyy analiz: vvedeniye. Per. N. Tyukina. Moskva : Izdatel’skiy dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2006. 245 s.
Vodotyka T., Mahda Ye. (2016). Ihry vidobrazhen’. Yakoyu bachyt’ Ukrayinu svit. Kharkiv : Vivat, 2016. 352 s.
Zherebko O. Suchasnyy stan ta tendentsiyi rozvytku ukrayins’kykh telefil’miv. Kurbasivs’ki chytannya. Naukovyy Visnyk Natsional’noho tsentru teatral’noho mystetstva imeni Lesya Kurbasa, 12, 2017. s. 18.
Klymans’ka L.D., Herasym H.Z. (2015). Media yak retranslyator sotsial’nykh problem. Sotsial’na robota v Ukrayini: teoriya i praktyka, 1-4, 2015. S. 77-87.
Len’o, P. Yu. Obraz “Inshoho” ta formuvannya kolektyvnykh identychnostey u Yevropi. Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorods’koho universytetu : Seriya: Istoriya, 2 (31), 2013. S. 186–187.
Lyaporov V. Brend-polytyka kak osnova vneshnepolytycheskoy stratehyy. Vlast’, 7, 2007. S. 66-70.
Nagornyak T., Osmolovska A. Prysutnist’ Ukrayiny v informatsiynomu prostori prykordonnykh derzhav pislya 2014 roku. Politolohichnyy visnyk KNU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, 85, 2020. Ss. 226–236.
Osmolovska A. Polityka formuvannya imidzhu Ukrayiny v informatsiynomu prostori zakordonnykh derzhav pislya 2014 r. (dysertatsiya na zdobuttya naukovoho stupenya doktora filosofiyi z politolohiyi) Vinnytsya: Donets’kyy natsional’nyy universytet imeni Vasylya Stusa, 2021. 252 s.
Stihlits Dzh. Hlobalizatsiya ta yiyi tyahar. Per. A. Ishchenko. Kyyiv : Vydavnychyy dim «KM Akademiya», 2003. 252 s.
Stratehiya publichnoyi dyplomatiyi MZS Ukrayiny 2021-2025. Ministerstvo zakordonnykh sprav Ukrayiny : ofitsiynyy portal. URL : https://mfa.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/1/Стратегії/public-diplomacy-strategy.pdf
Tarnavs’kyy V. Krayina yak brend. Novyy marketynh, 12, 2002. S. 55–62.
Tykhomyrova Ye.B. Stratehichni komunikatsiyi YES: instytutsional’nyy vymir. Politychne zhyttya, 4, 2016. S. 103−112.
Turchyn Ya. Elektronna dyplomatiya yak vazhlyva skladova zovnishn’oyi polityky derzhavy. Informatsiya, komunikatsiya, suspil’stvo 2014 : materialy 3-oyi Mizhnarodnoyi naukovoyi konferentsiyi IKS-2014.
L’viv : Natsional’nyy universytet «L’vivs’ka politekhnika», 2014. S. 104–105
Florida R. Kryza urbanizmu. Chomu mista roblyat’ nas neshchasnymy. Per. I. Bondarenko.
Kyyiv : «Nash Format», 2019. 320 s.
Uebster F. Ye. L. Vartanova (Red.) Teorii informatsionnogo obshchestva. Per. M. V. Arapov, N. V. Malykhina. Moskva : Aspekt Press, 2004. 400 s.
Shevchenko O.L. Novi realiyi brendynhu. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ Cherkas’koho derzhavnoho tekhnolohichnoho universytetu. Seriya : Ekonomichni nauky, 32(2), 2012. S. 118-122.
Shul’hina, L.M., Leo, M.V. Brendynh: teoriya ta praktyka (na prykladi ob”yektiv komertsiynoyi nerukhomosti): monohrafiya. Kyyiv-Ternopil’ : Aston, 2011. 267 s.
