Human rights in cyber-space through the prism of democratic theory.

Authors

  • M. M. Pervushyn Vasyl Stus’ Donetsk National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2020.1.7

Keywords:

Democratization, human rights, political communication, public sphere, cyber-space, pluralism, deliberative democracy

Abstract

As cyber-space gradually becomes a fully realized sphere of society and acquires a set of political connotations, the necessity of studying the virtual dimension of policy-making process becomes all the more urgent, including the need to pay more attention to the issue of human rights protection in cyber-space. At the same time, modern scientific research in the sphere of human rights mostly represents a fairly onedimensional point of view, as they focus on the legal side of the problem, primarily paying attention to the norms of international law. Present article explains and justifies the necessity and relevance of full-scale implementation of tools and methods of political science, particularly the concepts and ideas of pluralistic and deliberative democracy, in the process of studying the Internet as means of political communication, a tool for implementation of fundamental human rights, such as freedom of speech, the right to assembly and freedom of association.

Purpose of the research is complex in nature, as it strives to prove that the foundations for studying the ways the Internet influences policy-making process, were laid by classics of political studies in pre-digital and early digital era, while also analyzing the possibility of using the Internet as a tool of implementation of some of the main aspects of democratic theory beyond the boundaries of established democracies.

The research presented analysis of modern cyber-space against the background of J. Habermas’ concept of «public-sphere» as a space for productive and rational political discussion. Conclusions were also made concerning the possibility of application of communicative capacities of the Internet as the means of practical implementation of R. Dahl and J. Cohen concepts of democratic development. At the same time, presented set of practical proved the ability of online-community to perform the functions of civil society in authoritarian states, thus promoting development of certain aspects of democracy in the absence of traditional democratic institutions.

References

Perritt H. The Internet as a Threat to Sovereignty? Thoughts on the Internet's Role in Strengthening National and GlobalGovernance. Global Legal Studies Journal. 1998. Vol. 5, № 423 P. 423-442

Hardy I. T. The Proper Legal Regime for 'Cyberspace. College of William & Mary Law School. Faculty Publications. Vol. 55:993. 1994. P. 994-1053.

Barlow J. P. A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. Electronic Frontier Foundation. URL: https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence (Дата звернення: 02.02.2020).

Dahl R. A. What Political Institutions Does Large-Scale Democracy Require? Political Science Quarterly. 2005. Vol. 120, № 2. P. 187-197.

Bimber B. The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism. Polity. 1998. Vol. 32, № 1. P. 133-160. DOI: 10.2307/3235370

De Nardis L., Raymond M. Thinking Clearly About Multi-stakeholder Internet Governance. GigaNet: Global Internet Governance Academic Network, Annual Symposium 2013. 18 p. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2809780.

Scammell M. The Internet and Civic Engagement: The Age of the Citizen-Consumer. Political Communication. 2000. Vol. 17, № 4. P. 351-355. DOI: 10.1080/10584600050178951.

Habermas J. Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory. 2006. Vol. 16, № 4. P. 411-426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x.

Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Transl. from German by W. Rehg. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1998. 676 p.

Cohen J. Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. The Good Polity. Normative Analysis of the State

/ Edited by Alan Hamlin and Philip Petit. Basil Blackwell Ltd., 1989. P. 17-35.

Fishkin J. S. When the people speak. Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford University Press, 2009 – 236 p.

Bohman J. Deliberative Democracy And Effective Social Freedom: Capabilities, Resources And Opportunities. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics / Edited by James Bohman, William Rehg. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1997. P. 321-349.

Benkler Y. The wealth of networks: How social production transform markets and freedoom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006, 528 с.

Geiger R. S. Does Habermas Understand the Internet? The Algorithmic Construction of the Blogo/Public Sphere. Gnovis: A Journal of Communication, Culture and Technology. 2009. Vol. 1, № 10. P. 1-29.

URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2734947 (Дата звернення: 02.02.2020).

Laidlaw E. B. Internet Gatekeepers, Human Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility : A thesis submitted to the Law Department of the London School of Economics and Political Science : The London School of Economics and Political Science, 2012. 304 p.

Даль Р. Демократия и её критики. Пер. с англ. под ред. М.В.Ильина. М.: «Российская политическая энциклопедия» (РОССПЭН), 2003 – 576 с.

Jeffries S. A Rare Interview With Jurgen Habermas. Financial Times. 2010.

URL: https://www.ft.com/content/eda3bcd8-5327-11df-813e-00144feab49a (Дата звернення: 02.02.2020).

Sunstein C. The Daily We: Is the Internet Really a Blessing for Democracy. Boston Review. 2001. URL: http://bostonreview.net/cass-sunstein-internet-democracy-daily-we (Дата звернення: 02.02.2020).

Penney J. W. Internet Access Rights: A Brief History and Intellectual Origins. William Mitchell Law Review. 2011. Vol. 38, № 1, Article 11. P. 9-42. URL: https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol38/iss1/11/?utm_source= open.mitchellhamline.edu%2Fwmlr%2Fvol38%2Fiss1%2F11&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages (Дата звернення: 02.02.2020).

Souter D. Human Rights and the Internet: a review of perceptions in human rights organizations. Association for Progressive Communication, 2012. 55 p.

Luo. Yu. The Internet and Agenda Setting in China: The Influence of Online Public Opinion on Media Coverage and Government Policy. International Journal on Communication. 2014. № 8. P. 1289-1312.

URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/921e/3905572662c6c73b814887e6c7e8b0753213.pdf?_ga= 2.66531373.209446323.1580624449-1312827507.1568150147 (Дата звернення: 02.02.2020).

Beijing policemen fired over death of activist. Deutsche Welle. 2016. URL: https://www.dw.com/en/beijing-policemen-fired-over-death-of-activist/a-36951906 (Дата звернення: 17.02.2019).

Kay S., Zhao B., Sui D. Can Social Media Clear the Air? A Case Study in the Air Pollution Problem in Chinese Cities. The Professional Geographer. 2014. Vol. 67, № 3. P. 351-363. DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2014.970838.

Brooten L., Klangnarong S. People’s media and reform efforts in Thailand. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics. 2009. Vol. 5, № 1-2. P. 103-117. DOI: 10.1386/macp.5.1-2.103_1.

Thailand: Midnight University Website Shut Down in Wake of Protest. Open Net Initiative. 2006. URL: https://opennet.net/blog/2006/10/thailand-midnight-university-website-shut-down-wake-protest

(Дата звернення: 02.02.2020).

Rahimi B. Cyberdissent: Internet in Revolutionary Iran. Middle Eastern Review of International Affairs. 2003. Vol. 7, № 3. P. 101-115. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d47/94fc2eb1e075729bd2bc5761ff2a57 f22ad6.pdf?_ga=2.153123003.209446323.1580624449-1312827507.1568150147 (Дата звернення: 02.02.2020).

Osanloo A. The Politics of Women's Rights in Iran. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009. 282 p.

Iran steps up policing of Islamic dress – report. Reuters. 2008. URL: https://in.reuters.com/article/

idINIndia-35632520080924. (Дата звернення: 02.02.2020).

Matheisen K. The Human Right to Internet Access: A Philosophical Defense. New ICTs and Social Media: Revolution, Counter-Revolution and Social Change Edited by Christopher Coenen, Wolfgang Hofkirchner and José María Díaz Nafría, International Review of Information Ethics. 2012. Vol. 18, № 12. P. 9-22.

URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1544/0aa7ce6e1668d4ce9bb34680d03155df0b13.pdf?_ga= 2.133592845.209446323.1580624449-1312827507.1568150147. (Дата звернення: 02.02.2020).

Downloads

Issue

Section

Політичні інститути та процеси