Biopolical schools in the context of the development of modern political science.

Authors

  • A. Yu. Kravets Дніпропетровський національний університет ім. О. Гончара

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2018.1.7

Keywords:

biopolitics, biopolitical schools, empirical biopolitics, political behavior

Abstract

The main goal is to study leading biopolitical schools, their contribution to modern political science. It has been found that there are several powerful centers of biopolitical research, in particular in the USA and Germany. The American biopolitical school is represented by scientists from the University of Nebraska and the University of California. The Nebraska group focused on discovered and investigated genetic foundations of political ideologies. They believe that differences in political ideologies include a genetic component. Scientists from the University of California focused on creating a holistic set of scientific knowledge devoted to the genetic component of political behavior. They state that protossocial behavior is associated with specific genes. In 1903, the American Political Science Association was founded, which brings together over 13,000 scientists from 80 countries around the world. The main directions of their research are the nature of «political man», biological determinants of social and political behavior, the evolution of political systems, etc. The goal is to create a biologically oriented political science. A powerful biopolitical center was initiated in Germany by H. Flor and P. Mayer, who believed biopolitics to use the approaches, theories and methods of biological sciences in political science. It is stated that biopolitics is an innovative discipline of modern political discourse, and therefore the scientific community still does not produce a clear idea of the origins of biopolitics, its subject area and vocation. Accordingly, there is no clear idea of its significance for contemporary political science. A comprehensive approach is proposed that will cover most of the existing biopolitical schools and research areas and will highlight those aspects of biopolitical issues that are relevant to contemporary political theory and practice.

References

Олескин А. Биополитика. Политический потенциал современной биологии [Текст] / А. Олескин. – М.: Научный мир, 2007. – 459 с

Фуко М. Рождение биополитики. Курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1978–1979 учебном году [Текст] / М. Фуко. – [перевод с французскою А. В. Дьякова]. – СПб: «Наука» РАН, 2010. – 227 с.

About APSA – [Electronic resource] – Access mode: http://www.apsanet.org/ABOUT/About-APSA

Blank R. Biology and Politics: An Introduction [Text] / R. Blank // Politics and the Life Science: The State of the Discipline. – UK: Emerald Group Publishing, 2014. – 280 p.

Hannagan R. From genes to politics: Bridging the gap between biological and socialexplanations of political behavior via twin studies. [Text] / R. Hannagan // Biology and politics: The cutting edge. – UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2011. – Vol. 9. – P. 139-158.

Hibbing. J. Smith. К., Alford. J. Predisposed: liberals, conservatives, and the biology of political differences [Text] / J. Hibbing, K. Smith, J. Alford. – London: Routledge, 2013.

Johnson G. Politics and the life sciences [Text] / G. Johnson // Politics and the Life Sciences. – 2011. – Vol. 3(2). – P. 43-64.

IPSA. RC12 – Biology and Politics – [Electronic resource] – Access mode: http://www.ipsa.org/researchcommittees/rclist/RC12

Liesen L. The competing meanings of «biopolitics» in political science: Biological and postmodern approaches to politics [Text] / L. Liesen // Politics and the Life Sciences. – 2012. – Vol. 3/(1-2). – P. 2-15.

Lodge. M., Somit. A. The program at the state University of New York at Stony Brook [Text] / M. Lodge. A. Somit // The world of biology and politics: Organization and research areas: Research in Biopolitics. – UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013. – Vol. II. – P. 31-33.

Research Areas «UC Merced» – [Electronic resource] – Access mode: http://www.ucmerced.edu/graduateresearch-areas

Somit, A., Peterson S. International political science association’s research Committee [Text] / A. Somit, S. Peterson // The world of biology and politics: Organization and research areas. Research in Biopolitics. – UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013. – Vol. II. – P. 15-19.

Vlavianos Arvanitis A. Biopolicy – Building a green society// Cadmus, 2011 – Електронний ресурс] – Режим доступу: http://www.cadmusjournal.org/node/73»

Токовенко О., Третяк О. Політична істина: епістемологічні, методологічні та комунікативні імплікації. Монографія. – К: ТОВ НВА «Інтерсервіс», 2016. – 440 с.

Issue

Section

Політичні інститути та процеси