Collaborative Partnership: A Business-Factor in Forming a State Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2021.2.7Keywords:
collaborative partnership; collaboration; business partner; public-private partnership; collaborative governanceAbstract
The article presents an analysis of the behavioral patterns of private sector representatives for involving them in an effective partnership as part of a collaborative governance regime. The trend towards cooperation between the public sector, business, and civil society is gaining momentum due to the lack of own resources, the growing level of interdependence, and the benefits of equal risk sharing. However, critics of such a format of interaction draw attention to the possible power disproportion and the potential formation of a political course focused on the expectations of the private sector only. This ambivalence of views actualizes the consideration of issues related to the identification of ideal collaborative partners capable of directing efforts to jointly seek consensus solutions. Particular attention is focused on the differences between collaboration, public-private partnerships, and the privatization of public facilities as phenomena often presented as synonymous concepts due to the presence of common elements. Highlighting the types of political behavior, the author notes that the collaborative business partner must, firstly, recognize the importance of the problem, secondly, organically combine their benefits with the achievement of public results, and thirdly, focus on partnership agreements. The article provides examples of each political reaction of socio-economic actors, as well as the practice of collaborative partnership in the field of environmental policy and green energy. It is argued that by encouraging private sector cooperation on contentious policy issues, public entities may adopt a different policy format that applies to the whole community than the chosen social cohort, and therefore tends to achieve greater results. Given the insufficient study of collaborative partnership and its potential participants, the author claims the need for further comparative research on this range of issues.
References
Водяний А. Що таке «зелений» тариф і чому це стосується всіх? URL: https://lb.ua/economics/2020/07/22/462344_shcho_take_zeleniy_tarif_i_chomu_tse.html
Кудрицький В. Скорочення профіциту виробництва Енергоатома. URL: https://ua.energy/electricity-market/skorochennya-profitsytu-vyrobnytstva-energoatoma-ne-maye-vplynuty-na-zbilshennya-tsiny-elektroenergiyi-dlya-kintsevyh-spozhyvachiv-volodymyr-kudrytskyj/
Ansell, C., Gash A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008. 18(4): 543-71.
Andrews, R., Entwistle T. Does Cross-Sectoral Partnership Deliver? An Empirical Exploration of Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2010. 20(3): 679-701.
Bryson, J., Crosby B., and Stone M. The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review. Special issue, 2006, 66: 44-55.
Carmin, J., Darnall N., Mil-Homens J. Stakeholder Involvement in the Design of U.S. Voluntary Environmental Programs: Does Sponsorship Matter? Policy Studies Journal. 2003. Vol. 31(4): 527-43.
Carr, G. The Canadian Council for Public Private Partnerships. 1998. URL: http://home.inforamp.net
Donague J., Zeckhauser R. Public-Private Collaboration / Ed. Moran M., Rein M., Goodin E. 2006. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 496-525
Fischetti, M. Can U.S. Cars Meet the New 54 mpg CAFE Standards? URL: http://blogs.scientifi camerican.com/ observations/2011/11/16/can-cars-meet-the-new-54-mpg-CAFE-standards-yes-theycan/ [accessed August 21, 2015].
Forrer, J., Kee, E., Boyer, E. Public-Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question.
Public Administration Review. 2010. Vol. 4: 475-484
Goldsmith, S., and Eggers W. Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. 2004. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
Hansen, L., and Mitchell J. Disaggregating and Explaining Corporate Political Activity: Domestic and Foreign Corporations in National Politics, American Political Science Review. 2000. Vol. 94(4): 891-903.
Hansen, L., Wendy, L., Mitchell J., and Drope J. Collective Action, Pluralism, and the Legitimacy Tariff: Corporate Activity or Inactivity in Politics, Political Research Quarterly, 2004. Vol. 57(3): 421-429.
Eckerd, A., and Heidelberg R. Public Incentives, Market Motivations, and Contaminated Properties: New Public Management and Brownfield Liability Reform, Public Administration Review, 2015. Vol. 75(2): 252-261.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi T., and Balogh S. An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2012. Vol. 22(1): 1-30.
European Commission. Guidelines for Successful Public-Private Partnerships. 2003.
Imperial, M. Using Collaboration as a Governance Strategy: Lessons from Six Watershed Management Programs, Administration & Society, 2005. Vol. 37(3): 281-320.
Jones, Ch., and Levy D. North American Business Strategies towards Climate Change, European Management Journal, 2007. Vol. 25(6): 428-40.
Kettl, D. Managing Boundaries in American Administration: The Collaboration Imperative, Public Administration Review, 2006. Vol. 66: 10-19.
Kim, Y., Darnall N. Business as a Collaborative Partner: Understanding Firms’ Sociopolitical Support for Policy Formation, Public Administration Review, 2015. Vol.1: 1-12 – doi: 10.1111/puar.12463
Koontz, T., Thomas C. What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management? Public Administration Review, 2006. Vol. 66: 111-21.
Lin, H., and Darnall N. Strategic Alliance Formation and Structural Configuration, Journal of Business Ethics, 2015. Vol. 127(3): 549-64
Osborne, E. Public-private partnerships. Theory and practice in international perspective. Routledge, 2000.
Rivera, J. Business and Public Policy: Responses to Environmental and Social Protection Processes.
New York: Cambridge University Press. 2010.
Salamon, L. M. (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomson, A., and Perry J. Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box, Public Administration Review, 2006. Vol. 66: 20-32.
Yackee, J., and Yackee S. A Bias towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy, Journal of Politics, 2006. Vol. 68(1): 128-39.