«Windows of opportunities» of states in the conditions of the COVID-19 global pandemic

Authors

  • T. P. Khlivnyuk Одеський національний університет імені І. І. Мечникова

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2021.1.17

Keywords:

global pandemic; civil society; challenges of time; response events; «windows of opportunity»

Abstract

The global COVID-19 pandemic has clearly demonstrated all the «pain points» of countries, regardless of the type of government and the degree of socio-economic development. It is determined that the economies of most countries have already entered a deep recession, growing public debt. There are no prospects for the expected growth in the coming years, which has already emerged since the global financial crisis of 2008, but currently the progress of the last decade to overcome the financial crisis is offset, due to events related to COVID-19 and its global consequences in the socio-political sphere of any state. Countries and regions are developing new social policy strategies, tactics and strategies for further development that are adaptable to the demands of the times, for example, at the EU level the need for even a new «Marshall Plan» has been voiced.
Equally important is the issue of human mental health, the deterioration of which is associated with social isolation, distancing, and sometimes with job loss, which, of course, has a destructive effect on people and requires increased attention of state institutions to these important issues.
A new wave of populism is expected, caused by the rise of economic inequality against the background of the effects of the pandemic, which is clearly demonstrated by most countries.
There is every reason to believe that the global pandemic COVID-19 has become a determining factor in socio-political life and social interactions.
Thus, it can be argued that the global pandemic COVID-19 has opened «windows of opportunity» in the global political space, in which the state, depending on the level of democracy, sociality and lawmaking, make certain decisions to restrict certain rights of the population. and negative consequences. Thus, the «windows of opportunity» during the global pandemic opened all the «Achilles' heel» states, demonstrating their capabilities / inability to find adequate events-responses to the complex challenges of the world, which depended on the development of the country as a whole, its important civic attribute. society, the vector of direction of public policy, tools for exercising control over power, the focus on identifying priorities and the ability of states to overestimate their citizens from these challenges.

References

Хлівнюк Т. П. Зміна завдань соціальної політики на тлі викликів глобальної пандемії COVID-19. Міжнародна спільнота в умовах змін: багатовимірний підхід: колективна монографія. Т. 4 / за ред. О. Кордонської, Р. Кордонського. Ольштин – Львів: Інститут політичних наук Вармінсько-Мазурського університету в м. Ольштин (Польща), 2020. C. 191-202.

COVID-19: How to Get Tested, https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/covid-19/testing.htm, [17.08.2020]. Diхon R., No lockdown here: Belarus's strongman rejects coronavirus risks. He suggests saunas and vodka, «The Washington Post» 2020, 27 Mar.

Legrain Р. A COVID-19 Marshall Plan for Europe. URL: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/ european-union-covid-marshall-plan-by-philippe-legrain-2020-04?barrier=accesspaylog, [10.04.2020].

Хлівнюк Т. П Соціальний вплив COVID-19: видозміна громадсько-політичного активізму. Міжнародна спільнота в умовах змін: багатовимірний підхід:колективна монографія. Т. 2 / за ред. О. Кордонської, Р. Кордонського. Ольштин – Львів: Інститут політичних наук Вармінсько-Мазурського університету в м. Ольштин (Польща), 2020. С. 10-20.

Della Porta D., Fernández J., Kouki Н., Mosca L. Movement Parties Against Austerity, Cambridge 2017.

Хома Н. М. Моделі соціальної держави: світовий та український досвід: монографія. Київ: Видавництво «Юридична думка», 2012. С. 397

Cohen N. Beware a new wave of populism, born out of coronavirus-induced economic inequity, «The Guardian». 2020, 18 Apr.

Gould-Wartofsky M. A. The Occupiers: The Making of the 99 Percent Movement, New York, 2015.

Семигіна Т. Вікна можливостей. Новітня політична лексика (неологізми, оказіоналізми та інші новотворення. Енциклопедичний словник-довідник. За заг. ред. Н. М. Хоми. Львів: «Новий Світ – 2000», 2015. С. 54.

Global digital strike, https://fridaysforfuture.org/next-big-strike-april-24/, [18.03.2020].

Van der Wolf М. Economic, Environmental Interests Compete in a Post-COVID Europe, https://www.voanews.com/ covid-19-pandemic/economic-environmental-interests-compete-post-covid-europe, [12.08.2020].

Sharma G. Covid-19 is changing the way people protest around the world, https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/ covid-19-is-changing-the-way-people-protest-around-the-world-35229, [08.04.2020].

Published

2021-04-15

Issue

Section

Політичні проблеми міжнародних систем та глобального розвитку