The scandinavian model of neocorporativism: challenges and prospects.
Keywords:
neocorporatism, interest groups, social groups, coordination of interests, Scandinavian countriesAbstract
In the article author analyzes the features of neocorporatism in the Scandinavian countries. We identify the common and different in the development of neocorporatist institutions in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Particular attention is paid to the evolution of neocorporatism in these countries and the factors, changing the format of tripartite relations between the state, trade unions and employers' organizations. Consequently, the prospects of the neocorporatist model in each of the mentioned countries are determined.References
Шмиттер Ф. Неокорпоративизм // Политология: хрестоматия ; Сост. проф. М.А. Василик, доц. М. С. Вершинин. – М.: Гардарики, 2000. – С. 304-319.
Arter D. Democracy in Scandinavia: Consensual, Majoritarian or Mixed? / D. Arter. – Manchester University Press, Manchester, 2006. – 384 p.
Blom-Hansen J. Still Corporatism in Scandinavia? A Survey of Recent Empirical Findings / J. Blom-Hansen //Scandinavian Political Studies. – 2000. – Vol. 23, No. 2. – P. 157-181.
Christiansen P.M. Varieties of Democracy: Interest Groups and Corporatist Committees in Scandinavian Policy Making / P.M. Christiansen, A.S. Nørgaard, H. Rommetvedt, T. Svensson, G. Thesen and P. Öberg // VOLUNTAS – International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. – 2010. – Vol. 21, No. 1. – P. 22-40.
Compston H. The End of National Policy Concertation? Western Europe since the Single European Act / H. Compston // Journal of European Public Policy. – 1998. – Vol.5, No. 3. – P. 507-26.
Ingebritsen Ch. Scandinavia in World Politics. – Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Maryland, 2006.
Lindvall J. Policy Reform and the Decline of Corporatism in Sweden /J. Lindvall and J. Sebring // West European Politics. – 2005. – Vol. 28, No.5 – P. 1057-74;
Molina О. Corporatism: The Past, Present and Future of a Concept / О. Molina,M. Rhodes // Annual Review of Political Science. – No. 5. – 2002. – P. 305-331.
Öberg P. Disrupted Exchange and Declining Corporatism: Government Authority and. Interest Group Capability in Scandinavia /Öberg P., Svensson T., Christiansen P. M., H. Rommetvedt, Nørgaard A. S // Government and Opposition. – 2011. – Vol. 46, Issue 3. – P. 365-391.
Pestoff V. The Disappearance of Social Partnership in Sweden during the1990s and Its Sudden Reappearance in late 1998 [Електронний ресурс] / V. Pestoff // Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, Mannheim, March, 29-31, 1999. – Режим доступу: https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/cf74ec98-bcd8-43ad-b385-7a427f080949.pdf
Regini M. Between Deregulation and Social Pacts: The Responses of European Economies to Globalization / M. Regini // Politics and Society. – Vol.28, Issue 1. – 2000. – P. 5-33.
Varone F. How corporatist institutions shape the access of citizen groups to policy makers: Evidence from Denmark and Switzerland [Електронний ресурс] / F. Varone, P. M. Christiansen, A. Mach // Journal of European Public Policy. – 2017. – Режим доступу: https://archiveouverte.unige.ch/unige:91210
Varone F. The Transformations of Neo–Corporatism: Comparing Denmark and Switzerland over time / F. Varone, A. Mach, P. M. Christiansen // ECPR Joint Sessions 2015. – 2015. – 26 p.
