Sense of ownership and newly occupied territories

Abstract

This scientific article delves into the intricate dynamics surrounding the concept of "Sense of Ownership" within the context of newly occupied territories in the field of Political Sciences. As the global landscape continues to witness territorial changes, this study aims to unravel the psychological, social, and political dimensions that underlie the development and impact of a sense o ownership among diverse stakeholder groups.
The research employs a multidisciplinary approach, integrating insights from psychology, sociology, and political theory to comprehensively explore the factors influencing the formation of a sense of ownership in populations affected by territorial transitions. Drawing upon case studies from historical and contemporary geopolitical events, the article analyzes the role of identity, historical narratives, and international relations in shaping individuals’ and communities’ perceptions of ownership over newly acquired territories.
Furthermore, the article investigates the implications of a heightened sense of ownership on state-building processes, governance structures, and conflict resolution strategies in the aftermath of territorial changes. By synthesizing theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence, the study contributes to a nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between human psychology, societal dynamics, and political outcomes in the context of territorial acquisitions.
The findings of this research have significant implications for policymakers, scholars, and practitioners involved in addressing the challenges associated with newly occupied territories. By illuminating the multifaceted nature of the sense of ownership, this article seeks to foster a more informed and nuanced approach to the management and resolution of conflicts arising from territorial changes, ultimately contributing to the broader discourse on stability and peace in international relations.
Objective of the study: To provide an extensive report of the topic of affected people in conflicts who are subjected to their sense of ownership and belonging foundations being challenged; to propose, substantiate and introduce the notion of correlation between national identity and areas of disputed geographical entities prior, during and after a geopolitical conflict occurs.
Methodology: With the help of emphasizing on complex historical events which describe the existence of disputed geographical entities, in which the substantial protection of human rights is threatened by aiming to disrupt the foundations of national identity for the affected social groups, and create the foundations of national identity for the social group that will be established in the geographical entity, often constituting the invading social group.
Results and Conclusions: To demonstrate that global institutions for functions affecting unrecognized entities have little effect on supporting the affected social group when the invading social group is able to not adhere to the policies it doesn’t support, thus the increase in the number of stateless individuals who suffer what they must. It has been concluded that the status of geographically disputes areas can be considered stable when the protection of human rights is guaranteed and a social group’s sense of ownership isn’t disputed, either by the entities involved, or by third party entities.